Comparison of the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay, Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

J. Arbique, K. Forward, D. Haldane, R. Davidson

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

25 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Early detection of methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) is critical for both the management of infected patients, and the timely institution of appropriate infection control measures. Although detection of the mecA gene by PCR remains the gold standard, this technology is inaccessible for many laboratories. Therefore, we sought to evaluate several new rapid identification systems and compare them to PCR. A total of 71 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 25 borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA), and 213 MRSA were selected for study. S.aureus was identified using standard methods. Initial screening was performed on a Mueller-Hinton agar plate with 6 mg/L of oxacillin. MRSA strains were identified using PCR with primers specific for the mecA gene. PCR was used as the reference method. All isolates were tested using the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Maryland, USA), the MRSA-Screen Assay (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay (ID Biomedical Corp, Vancouver, BC). With minor modifications, all assays were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Overall, the 3 commercial assays performed well. The sensitivity and specificity of the BBL, Denka, and Velogene systems were 99%/100%, 99%/100%, and 96%/100% respectively. The advantages of the phenotypic tests - BBL Crystal Kit and Denka MRSA-Screen Assay include lower cost per test, shelf-life, ease of use, and rapid turn-around times. Advantages of the Velogene Rapid MRSA include ability to perform genotypic high-volume testing without the equipment requirements and technical complexity involved with PCR. Turn-around times ranged from 15 min for the Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, 2 h for the Velogene Rapid MRSA, and 4 h for the BBL Crystal. The BBL Crystal, Denka MRSA-Screen, and Velogene Rapid MRSA identification systems are rapid, easy to perform, and provide accurate identification of MRSA. These rapid kits offer an acceptable alternative for smaller, non-reference, laboratories and reduce the dependency on PCR in larger laboratories for routine confirmation.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)5-10
Nombre de pages6
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume40
Numéro de publication1-2
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - 2001
Publié à l'externeOui

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Comparison of the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay, Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer