Core Outcome Domains and Measures for Pediatric Acute and Chronic/Recurrent Pain Clinical Trials: PedIMMPACT Recommendations

Patrick J. McGrath, Gary A. Walco, Dennis C. Turk, Robert H. Dworkin, Mark T. Brown, Karina Davidson, Christopher Eccleston, G. Allen Finley, Kenneth Goldschneider, Lynne Haverkos, Sharon H. Hertz, Gustaf Ljungman, Tonya Palermo, Bob A. Rappaport, Thomas Rhodes, Neil Schechter, Jane Scott, Navil Sethna, Ola K. Svensson, Jennifer StinsonCarl L. von Baeyer, Lynn Walker, Steven Weisman, Richard E. White, Anne Zajicek, Lonnie Zeltzer

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

683 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Under the auspices of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT), 26 professionals from academia, governmental agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry participated in a 2-stage Delphi poll and a consensus meeting that identified core outcome domains and measures that should be considered in clinical trials of treatments for acute and chronic pain in children and adolescents. Consensus was refined by consultation with the international pediatric pain community through announcement of our recommendations on the Pediatric Pain List and inviting and incorporating comments from external sources. There was consensus that investigators conducting pediatric acute pain clinical trials should consider assessing outcomes in pain intensity; global judgment of satisfaction with treatment; symptoms and adverse events; physical recovery; emotional response; and economic factors. There was also agreement that investigators conducting pediatric clinical trials in chronic and recurrent pain should consider assessing outcomes in pain intensity; physical functioning; emotional functioning; role functioning; symptoms and adverse events; global judgment of satisfaction with treatment; sleep; and economic factors. Specific measures or measurement strategies were recommended for different age groups for each domain. Perspective: Based on systematic review and consensus of experts, core domains and measures for clinical trials to treat pain in children and adolescents were defined. This will assist in comparison and pooling of data and promote evidence-based treatment, encourage complete reporting of outcomes, simplify the review of proposals and manuscripts, and facilitate clinicians making informed decisions regarding treatment.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)771-783
Nombre de pages13
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume9
Numéro de publication9
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - sept. 2008

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
Supported by unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Merck and Co, and Pfizer to the University of Rochester Office of Continuing Professional Education to support the IMMPACT Delphi poll, background literature reviews, and consensus meeting described in this article.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Practice Guideline
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Core Outcome Domains and Measures for Pediatric Acute and Chronic/Recurrent Pain Clinical Trials: PedIMMPACT Recommendations'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer