TY - JOUR
T1 - Depression and Anxiety in Relation to Social Status
T2 - A Prospective Epidemiologic Study
AU - Murphy, Jane M.
AU - Olivier, Donald C.
AU - Monson, Richard R.
AU - Sobol, Arthur M.
AU - Federman, Elizabeth B.
AU - Leighton, Alexander H.
PY - 1991/3
Y1 - 1991/3
N2 - Longitudinal research in Stirling County, Atlantic Canada, indicated that during the 1950s and 1960s the prevalence of depression was significantly and persistently higher in the “low” socioeconomic status population than at other socioeconomic status levels. Anxiety was found to show a less clear picture. Incidence of depression after the study started was also higher among those who were initially in the low socioeconomic status group, supporting the view that the stress of poverty may be causally related to depression. There was also a trend for prior depression to be associated with subsequent downward social mobility, supporting the view that the concentration of depressed people at the lower end of the social hierarchy may result from handicapping aspects of the illness. Neither of these trends was statistically significant. More striking was evidence that, irrespective of socioeconomic status, depression carried a substantial risk for poor clinical course and outcome. Both depression and poverty tended to be chronic, and, accordingly, their association at the end of the study was influenced by their association at its beginning. The stability of the relationship between poverty and depression warrants the attention of caregivers and policymakers and raises new questions about strategies for the study of causal sequences.
AB - Longitudinal research in Stirling County, Atlantic Canada, indicated that during the 1950s and 1960s the prevalence of depression was significantly and persistently higher in the “low” socioeconomic status population than at other socioeconomic status levels. Anxiety was found to show a less clear picture. Incidence of depression after the study started was also higher among those who were initially in the low socioeconomic status group, supporting the view that the stress of poverty may be causally related to depression. There was also a trend for prior depression to be associated with subsequent downward social mobility, supporting the view that the concentration of depressed people at the lower end of the social hierarchy may result from handicapping aspects of the illness. Neither of these trends was statistically significant. More striking was evidence that, irrespective of socioeconomic status, depression carried a substantial risk for poor clinical course and outcome. Both depression and poverty tended to be chronic, and, accordingly, their association at the end of the study was influenced by their association at its beginning. The stability of the relationship between poverty and depression warrants the attention of caregivers and policymakers and raises new questions about strategies for the study of causal sequences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025978261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025978261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810270035004
DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810270035004
M3 - Article
C2 - 1996918
AN - SCOPUS:0025978261
SN - 0003-990X
VL - 48
SP - 223
EP - 229
JO - Archives of General Psychiatry
JF - Archives of General Psychiatry
IS - 3
ER -