Evaluation of HCC response to locoregional therapy: Validation of MRI-based response criteria versus explant pathology

Sonja Gordic, Idoia Corcuera-Solano, Ashley Stueck, Cecilia Besa, Pamela Argiriadi, Preethi Guniganti, Michael King, Shingo Kihira, James Babb, Swan Thung, Bachir Taouli

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

55 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Background and Aims This study evaluates the performance of various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) response criteria for the prediction of complete pathologic necrosis (CPN) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) post locoregional therapy (LRT) using explant pathology as a reference. Methods We included 61 patients (male/female 46/15; mean age 60 years) who underwent liver transplantation after LRT with transarterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency or microwave ablation (n = 56), or 90Yttrium radioembolization (n = 5). MRI was performed <90 days before liver transplantation. Three independent readers assessed the following criteria: RECIST, EASL, modified RECIST (mRECIST), percentage of necrosis on subtraction images, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), both qualitative (signal intensity) and quantitative (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]). The degree of necrosis was retrospectively assessed at histopathology. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa were used to assess inter-reader agreement. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine imaging predictors of CPN. Pearson correlation was performed between imaging criteria and pathologic degree of tumor necrosis. Results A total of 97 HCCs (mean size 2.3 ± 1.3 cm) including 28 with CPN were evaluated. There was excellent inter-reader agreement (ICC 0.77–0.86, all methods). EASL, mRECIST, percentage of necrosis and qualitative DWI were all significant (p <0.001) predictors of CPN, while RECIST and ADC were not. EASL, mRECIST and percentage of necrosis performed similarly (area under the curves [AUCs] 0.810–0.815) while the performance of qualitative DWI was lower (AUC 0.622). Image subtraction demonstrated the strongest correlation (r = 0.71–0.72, p <0.0001) with pathologic degree of tumor necrosis. Conclusions EASL/mRECIST criteria and image subtraction have excellent diagnostic performance for predicting CPN in HCC treated with LRT, with image subtraction correlating best with pathologic degree of tumor necrosis. Thus, MR image subtraction is recommended for assessing HCC response to LRT. Lay summary The assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor necrosis after locoregional therapy is essential for additional treatment planning and estimation of outcome. In this study, we assessed the performance of various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) response criteria (RECIST, mRECIST, EASL, percentage of necrosis on subtraction images, and diffusion-weighted imaging) for the prediction of complete pathologic necrosis of HCC post locoregional therapy on liver explant. Patients who underwent liver transplantation after locoregional therapy were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent routine liver MRI within 90 days of liver transplantation. EASL/mRECIST criteria and image subtraction had excellent diagnostic performance for predicting complete pathologic necrosis in treated HCC, with image subtraction correlating best with pathologic degree of tumor necrosis.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)1213-1221
Nombre de pages9
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume67
Numéro de publication6
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - déc. 2017
Publié à l'externeOui

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
Sonja Gordic: Swiss National Science Foundation , Fellowship P2ZHP3_161691 .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Hepatology

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Evaluation of HCC response to locoregional therapy: Validation of MRI-based response criteria versus explant pathology'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer