TY - JOUR
T1 - Fetal and Perinatal Autopsy in Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Abnormalities With Normal Karyotype
AU - Désilets, Valérie
AU - Oligny, Luc Laurier
AU - Wilson, R. Douglas
AU - Allen, Victoria M.
AU - Audibert, François
AU - Blight, Claire
AU - Brock, Jo Ann
AU - Carroll, June
AU - Cartier, Lola
AU - Gagnon, Alain
AU - Johnson, Jo Ann
AU - Langlois, Sylvie
AU - Murphy-Kaulbeck, Lynn
AU - Okun, Nanette
AU - Pastuck, Melanie
AU - Gilmour, Donna
AU - Bell, Douglas
AU - Carson, George
AU - Hughes, Owen
AU - Le Jour, Caroline
AU - Leduc, Dean
AU - Leyland, Nicholas
AU - Martyn, Paul
AU - Masse, André
AU - Wolfman, Wendy
AU - Ehman, William
AU - Biringer, Anne
AU - Gagnon, Andrée
AU - Graves, Lisa
AU - Hey, Jonathan
AU - Konkin, Jill
AU - Léger, Francine
AU - Marshall, Cindy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Objective: To review the information on fetal and perinatal autopsies, the process of obtaining consent, and the alternative informationgathering options following a prenatal diagnosis of nonchromosomal malformations, and to assist clinicians in providing postnatal counselling regarding fetal diagnosis and recurrence risks. Outcomes: To provide better counselling about fetal and perinatal autopsies for women and families who are dealing with a prenatally diagnosed non-chromosomal fetal anomaly. Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2009 and 2010, using appropriate key words (fetal autopsy, postmortem, autopsy, perinatal postmortem examination, autopsy protocol, postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy consent, tissue retention, autopsy evaluation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. Benefits, harms, and costs: This update educates readers about (1) the benefits of a fetal perinatal autopsy, (2) the consent process, and (3) the alternatives when the family declines autopsy. It also provides a standardized approach to fetal and perinatal autopsies, emphasizing pertinent additional sampling when indicated. Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).
AB - Objective: To review the information on fetal and perinatal autopsies, the process of obtaining consent, and the alternative informationgathering options following a prenatal diagnosis of nonchromosomal malformations, and to assist clinicians in providing postnatal counselling regarding fetal diagnosis and recurrence risks. Outcomes: To provide better counselling about fetal and perinatal autopsies for women and families who are dealing with a prenatally diagnosed non-chromosomal fetal anomaly. Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2009 and 2010, using appropriate key words (fetal autopsy, postmortem, autopsy, perinatal postmortem examination, autopsy protocol, postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy consent, tissue retention, autopsy evaluation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. Benefits, harms, and costs: This update educates readers about (1) the benefits of a fetal perinatal autopsy, (2) the consent process, and (3) the alternatives when the family declines autopsy. It also provides a standardized approach to fetal and perinatal autopsies, emphasizing pertinent additional sampling when indicated. Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856625981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856625981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35055-1
DO - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35055-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 22014783
AN - SCOPUS:84856625981
SN - 1701-2163
VL - 33
SP - 1047
EP - 1057
JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
IS - 10
ER -