Fetal and Perinatal Autopsy in Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Abnormalities With Normal Karyotype

Valérie Désilets, Luc Laurier Oligny, R. Douglas Wilson, Victoria M. Allen, François Audibert, Claire Blight, Jo Ann Brock, June Carroll, Lola Cartier, Alain Gagnon, Jo Ann Johnson, Sylvie Langlois, Lynn Murphy-Kaulbeck, Nanette Okun, Melanie Pastuck, Donna Gilmour, Douglas Bell, George Carson, Owen Hughes, Caroline Le JourDean Leduc, Nicholas Leyland, Paul Martyn, André Masse, Wendy Wolfman, William Ehman, Anne Biringer, Andrée Gagnon, Lisa Graves, Jonathan Hey, Jill Konkin, Francine Léger, Cindy Marshall

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

35 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Objective: To review the information on fetal and perinatal autopsies, the process of obtaining consent, and the alternative informationgathering options following a prenatal diagnosis of nonchromosomal malformations, and to assist clinicians in providing postnatal counselling regarding fetal diagnosis and recurrence risks. Outcomes: To provide better counselling about fetal and perinatal autopsies for women and families who are dealing with a prenatally diagnosed non-chromosomal fetal anomaly. Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2009 and 2010, using appropriate key words (fetal autopsy, postmortem, autopsy, perinatal postmortem examination, autopsy protocol, postmortem magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy consent, tissue retention, autopsy evaluation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. Benefits, harms, and costs: This update educates readers about (1) the benefits of a fetal perinatal autopsy, (2) the consent process, and (3) the alternatives when the family declines autopsy. It also provides a standardized approach to fetal and perinatal autopsies, emphasizing pertinent additional sampling when indicated. Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)1047-1057
Nombre de pages11
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Volume33
Numéro de publication10
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - 2011

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© 2011 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Fetal and Perinatal Autopsy in Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Abnormalities With Normal Karyotype'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer