Résumé
Economic games are used to elicit a social, conflictual situation in which people have to make decisions weighing self-related and collective interests. Combining these games with task-based fMRI has been shown to be successful in investigating the neural underpinnings of cooperative behaviors. However, it remains elusive to which extent resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) represents an individual’s propensity to prosocial behaviors in the context of economic games. Here, we investigated whether task-free RSFC predicts individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocate in a one-round trust game (TG) employing a prediction-analytics framework. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocity could be predicted by individual differences in the RSFC. Different subnetworks of the default-mode network associated with mentalizing exclusively predicted trust and reciprocity. Moreover, reciprocity was further predicted by the frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks associated with cognitive control and saliency, respectively. Our results contribute to a better understanding of how complex social behaviors are enrooted in large-scale intrinsic brain dynamics, which may represent neuromarkers for impairment of prosocial behavior in mental health disorders.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 165-176 |
Nombre de pages | 12 |
Journal | Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience |
Volume | 19 |
Numéro de publication | 1 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - févr. 15 2019 |
Publié à l'externe | Oui |
Note bibliographique
Funding Information:Acknowledgements This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (P-57191936 to F. K.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Psychonomic Society, Inc.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience