Résumé
Background: Compared to other patient population groups, the field of amputation research in Canada lacks cohesion largely due to limited funding sources, lack of connection among research scientists, and loose ties among geographically dispersed healthcare centres, research institutes and advocacy groups. As a result, advances in clinical care are hampered and ultimately negatively influence outcomes of persons living with limb loss. Objective: To stimulate a national strategy on advancing amputation research in Canada, a consensus-workshop was organized with an expert panel of stakeholders to identify key research priorities and potential strategies to build researcher and funding capacity in the field. Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used to gain consensus on identifying and selecting an initial set of priorities for building research capacity in the field of amputation. This included an anonymous pre-meeting survey (N = 31 respondents) followed by an in-person consensus-workshop meeting that hosted 38 stakeholders (researchers, physiatrists, surgeons, prosthetists, occupational and physical therapists, community advocates, and people with limb loss). Results: The top three identified research priorities were: (1) developing a national dataset; (2) obtaining health economic data to illustrate the burden of amputation to the healthcare system and to patients; and (3) improving strategies related to outcome measurement in patients with limb loss (e.g. identifying, validating, and/or developing outcome measures). Strategies for moving these priorities into action were also developed. Conclusions: The consensus-workshop provided an initial roadmap for limb loss research in Canada, and the event served as an important catalyst for stakeholders to initiate collaborations for moving identified priorities into action. Given the increasing number of people undergoing an amputation, there needs to be a stronger Canadian collaborative approach to generate the necessary research to enhance evidence-based clinical care and policy decision-making.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Limb loss is a growing concern across North America, with lower-extremity amputations occurring due to complications arising from diabetes being a major cause. To advance knowledge about limb loss and to improve clinical care for this population, stronger connections are needed across the continuum of care (acute, rehabilitation, community) and across sectors (clinical, advocacy, industry and research). There are new surgical techniques, technologies, and rehabilitation approaches being explored to improve the health, mobility and community participation of people with limb loss, but further research evidence is needed to demonstrate efficacy and to better integrate them into standard clinical care.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 2779-2789 |
Nombre de pages | 11 |
Journal | Disability and Rehabilitation |
Volume | 43 |
Numéro de publication | 19 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - 2021 |
Publié à l'externe | Oui |
Note bibliographique
Funding Information:for this initiative was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Planning & Dissemination Grant Program [Grant# 158363]. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support Dan Blocka from Boundless Biomechanical Bracing, Mariam Botros from Wounds Canada, Betty Cheung and Adam Saporta from St. John’s Rehab Hospital at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and Shane Glasford from Sunnybrook Centre for Independent Living (SCIL) at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. As well, we would like to thank Ethan J. Mings from the Desk Consulting Group Inc. for his support in planning and facilitating the consensus-workshop. Finally, we would like to dedicate this article to Ms. Jean Kim, our patient partner, who sadly passed away prior to our consensus workshop.
Funding Information:
Despite the pockets of innovative and promising lines of research aimed at improving the physical, mental and social health of people with limb loss, the full potential of the Canadian field is not being realized partly because of a lack of dedicated funding agencies and national coordinating research organizations for limb loss. Other patient populations with chronic disabilities, such as spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke, have several provincial, national and international research funding agencies, which can support preliminary pilot data; thereby contributing to higher success for obtaining highly competitive national sources of funding (e.g. Canadian Institutes of Health Research) available to fund long-term programs of research. For instance, SCI researchers can apply for funding from Canadian agencies such as the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Rick Hansen Institute, as well as international funders including the Paralyzed Veterans of America, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, and the Wings for Life Spinal Cord Research Foundation, among others. In particular, funding from the Rick Hansen Institute supported researchers in Canada to obtain important data highlighting the economic burden of the lifetime costs associated with SCI ($1.5 million CAD for people with paraplegia; $3 million CAD for tetraplegia), and newly injured individuals cost the healthcare system approximately $2.7 billion CAD per year []. These economic data in turn provides a convincing argument to fund studies and influence policies that can help with the recovery process and/or better manage the condition once people are discharged into the community. Similar to limb loss, SCI is a relatively infrequent event, with an incidence of approximately 3,500 new cases per year and a prevalence of approximately 86,000 people with traumatic and non-traumatic SCI living in Canada []. Hence, obtaining important insights on a population that hold healthcare and social system implications can help strengthen arguments for research funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Rehabilitation
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't