TY - JOUR
T1 - Indocyanine green angiography
T2 - An evaluation of image enhancement for the identification of occult choroidal neovascular membranes
AU - Maberley, David A.L.
AU - Cruess, Alan F.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic yield of occult choroidal neovascularization from examination of nonenhanced digital indocyanine green (ICG) angiograms versus examination of both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced angiograms. Methods: Fifty consecutive occult choroidal neovascular membranes were examined using ICG angiography at the Queen's University Eye Department. These studies were retrospectively reviewed in a masked fashion using the nonenhanced images. A subsequent examination of the same images was then performed using both the nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. Each study was graded as focal hyperfluorescence, plaque hyperfluorescence, isofluorescence, or hypofluorescence. Results: Of the cases reviewed, only 36% (18/50) of the membranes were well-defined on nonenhanced ICG angiography, compared with 58% (28/50) using image enhancement in addition to the nonenhanced images. This was a statistically significant difference in image definition between the two groups (chi-square test; P < 0.005). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced angiograms, when used in conjunction with nonenhanced ICG images, allowed for a significantly higher diagnostic yield when compared with the study of nonenhanced images alone.
AB - Purpose: To determine the diagnostic yield of occult choroidal neovascularization from examination of nonenhanced digital indocyanine green (ICG) angiograms versus examination of both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced angiograms. Methods: Fifty consecutive occult choroidal neovascular membranes were examined using ICG angiography at the Queen's University Eye Department. These studies were retrospectively reviewed in a masked fashion using the nonenhanced images. A subsequent examination of the same images was then performed using both the nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. Each study was graded as focal hyperfluorescence, plaque hyperfluorescence, isofluorescence, or hypofluorescence. Results: Of the cases reviewed, only 36% (18/50) of the membranes were well-defined on nonenhanced ICG angiography, compared with 58% (28/50) using image enhancement in addition to the nonenhanced images. This was a statistically significant difference in image definition between the two groups (chi-square test; P < 0.005). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced angiograms, when used in conjunction with nonenhanced ICG images, allowed for a significantly higher diagnostic yield when compared with the study of nonenhanced images alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033507204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033507204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00006982-199901000-00006
DO - 10.1097/00006982-199901000-00006
M3 - Article
C2 - 10048371
AN - SCOPUS:0033507204
SN - 0275-004X
VL - 19
SP - 37
EP - 44
JO - Retina
JF - Retina
IS - 1
ER -