TY - JOUR
T1 - Menstrual pain intensity, coping, and disability
T2 - The role of pain catastrophizing
AU - Walsh, Trudi M.
AU - LeBlanc, Leeanne
AU - McGrath, Patrick J.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - Objective. Menstrual pain or primary dysmenorrhea has not received much attention in the field of pain research. Little is understood about the effects menstrual pain has on the women who experience it. No studies to date have examined the cognitive factors related to the perceived intensity and coping of menstrual pain. To investigate these areas further, this study examined the associations between pain catastrophizing and how women perceive and cope with menstrual pain. Design. A prospective and retrospective between-subjects study. Participants. Ninety-three undergraduate women, with a regular menstrual period and no pre-existing pain disorder (e.g., endometriosis) that affects menstrual pain, were classified into high or low pain catastrophizing groups. Outcome Measures. Participants completed several self-reported questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing, menstrual pain intensity, coping, and disability. Results. High pain catastrophizers, in comparison with low pain catastrophizers, reported greater menstrual pain intensities, greater affective menstrual pain intensity, greater variability in the use of pain coping strategies, lower perceived effectiveness of over-the-counter medications and non-medical pain coping strategies, and greater disability. Conclusions. The results extend our knowledge about the associations between pain catastrophizing and menstrual pain, reemphasize that pain experience is best viewed as a multidimensional construct, and have implications for the management of menstrual pain.
AB - Objective. Menstrual pain or primary dysmenorrhea has not received much attention in the field of pain research. Little is understood about the effects menstrual pain has on the women who experience it. No studies to date have examined the cognitive factors related to the perceived intensity and coping of menstrual pain. To investigate these areas further, this study examined the associations between pain catastrophizing and how women perceive and cope with menstrual pain. Design. A prospective and retrospective between-subjects study. Participants. Ninety-three undergraduate women, with a regular menstrual period and no pre-existing pain disorder (e.g., endometriosis) that affects menstrual pain, were classified into high or low pain catastrophizing groups. Outcome Measures. Participants completed several self-reported questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing, menstrual pain intensity, coping, and disability. Results. High pain catastrophizers, in comparison with low pain catastrophizers, reported greater menstrual pain intensities, greater affective menstrual pain intensity, greater variability in the use of pain coping strategies, lower perceived effectiveness of over-the-counter medications and non-medical pain coping strategies, and greater disability. Conclusions. The results extend our knowledge about the associations between pain catastrophizing and menstrual pain, reemphasize that pain experience is best viewed as a multidimensional construct, and have implications for the management of menstrual pain.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347917134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347917134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2003.03039.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2003.03039.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 14750911
AN - SCOPUS:0347917134
SN - 1526-2375
VL - 4
SP - 352
EP - 361
JO - Pain Medicine
JF - Pain Medicine
IS - 4
ER -