TY - JOUR
T1 - NASHA hyaluronic acid vs methylprednisolone for knee osteoarthritis
T2 - A prospective, multi-centre, randomized, non-inferiority trial
AU - Leighton, R.
AU - Åkermark, C.
AU - Therrien, R.
AU - Richardson, J. B.
AU - Andersson, M.
AU - Todman, M. G.
AU - Arden, N. K.
AU - Ther-rien, René
AU - Bell, Mary
AU - Thorne, Carter
AU - Bensen, William
AU - Cividino, Alfred
AU - Olszynski, Woijciech
AU - Khraishi, Majed
AU - Dobson, Crawford
AU - Leighton, Ross
AU - Werle, Jason
AU - Alleyne, Julia
AU - Litchfield, Robert
AU - Stanish, William
AU - Chow, Andrew
AU - Wilson, Diane
AU - Arden, Nigel
AU - Birrel, Fraser
AU - Richardson, James
AU - Scott, David
AU - Åkermark, Christian
AU - Isacson, Johan
AU - Ericsäter, Jan
AU - Adalberth, Torsten
AU - Melberg, Per Erik
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Objective: To compare NASHA hyaluronic acid gel as single-injection intra-articular (IA) treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) against methylprednisolone acetate (MPA). Design: This was a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. A unique, open-label extension phase (OLE) was undertaken to answer further important clinical questions. Subjects with painful unilateral knee OA were treated and followed for 26 weeks (blinded phase). All patients attending the clinic at 26 weeks were offered NASHA treatment, with a subsequent 26-week follow-up period (extension phase). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of NASHA vs MPA in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥40% improvement from baseline in WOMAC pain score and an absolute improvement of ≥5 points) at 12 weeks. Results: In total, 442 participants were enrolled. The primary objective was met, with NASHA producing a non-inferior response rate vs MPA at 12 weeks (NASHA: 44.6%; MPA: 46.2%; difference [95% CI]: 1.6% [-11.2%;+7.9%]). Effect size for WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness scores favoured NASHA over MPA from 12 to 26 weeks. In response to NASHA treatment at 26 weeks, sustained improvements were seen in WOMAC outcomes irrespective of initial treatment. No serious device-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. Conclusions: This study shows that single-injection NASHA was well tolerated and non-inferior to MPA at 12 weeks. The benefit of NASHA was maintained to 26 weeks while that of MPA declined. An injection of NASHA at 26 weeks conferred long-term improvements without increased sensitivity or risk of complications.Study identifier: NCT01209364 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
AB - Objective: To compare NASHA hyaluronic acid gel as single-injection intra-articular (IA) treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) against methylprednisolone acetate (MPA). Design: This was a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. A unique, open-label extension phase (OLE) was undertaken to answer further important clinical questions. Subjects with painful unilateral knee OA were treated and followed for 26 weeks (blinded phase). All patients attending the clinic at 26 weeks were offered NASHA treatment, with a subsequent 26-week follow-up period (extension phase). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of NASHA vs MPA in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥40% improvement from baseline in WOMAC pain score and an absolute improvement of ≥5 points) at 12 weeks. Results: In total, 442 participants were enrolled. The primary objective was met, with NASHA producing a non-inferior response rate vs MPA at 12 weeks (NASHA: 44.6%; MPA: 46.2%; difference [95% CI]: 1.6% [-11.2%;+7.9%]). Effect size for WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness scores favoured NASHA over MPA from 12 to 26 weeks. In response to NASHA treatment at 26 weeks, sustained improvements were seen in WOMAC outcomes irrespective of initial treatment. No serious device-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. Conclusions: This study shows that single-injection NASHA was well tolerated and non-inferior to MPA at 12 weeks. The benefit of NASHA was maintained to 26 weeks while that of MPA declined. An injection of NASHA at 26 weeks conferred long-term improvements without increased sensitivity or risk of complications.Study identifier: NCT01209364 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891748140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891748140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 24185114
AN - SCOPUS:84891748140
SN - 1063-4584
VL - 22
SP - 17
EP - 25
JO - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
JF - Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
IS - 1
ER -