TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing postoperative care protocols in thoracic surgery
T2 - Best evidence and new technology
AU - French, Daniel G.
AU - Dilena, Michael
AU - LaPlante, Simon
AU - Shamji, Farid
AU - Sundaresan, Sudhir
AU - Villeneuve, James
AU - Seely, Andrew
AU - Maziak, Donna
AU - Gilbert, Sebastien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Abstract: Postoperative clinical pathways have been shown to improve postoperative care and decrease length of stay in hospital. In thoracic surgery there is a need to develop chest tube management pathways. This paper considers four aspects of chest tube management: (I) appraising the role of chest X-rays in the management of lung resection patients with chest drains; (II) selecting of a fluid output threshold below which chest tubes can be removed safely; (III) deciding whether suction should be applied to chest tubes; (IV) and selecting the safest method for chest tube removal. There is evidence that routine use of chest X-rays does not influence the management of chest tubes. There is a lack of consensus on the highest fluid output threshold below which chest tubes can be safely removed. The optimal use of negative intra-pleural pressure has not yet been established despite multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. When attempting to improve efficiency in the management of chest tubes, evidence in support of drain removal without a trial of water seal should be considered. Inconsistencies in the interpretation of air leaks and in chest tube management are likely contributors to the conflicting results found in the literature. New digital pleural drainage systems, which provide a more objective air leak assessment and can record air leak trend over time, will likely contribute to the development of new evidence-based guidelines. Technology should be combined with continued efforts to standardize care, create clinical pathways, and analyze their impact on postoperative outcomes.
AB - Abstract: Postoperative clinical pathways have been shown to improve postoperative care and decrease length of stay in hospital. In thoracic surgery there is a need to develop chest tube management pathways. This paper considers four aspects of chest tube management: (I) appraising the role of chest X-rays in the management of lung resection patients with chest drains; (II) selecting of a fluid output threshold below which chest tubes can be removed safely; (III) deciding whether suction should be applied to chest tubes; (IV) and selecting the safest method for chest tube removal. There is evidence that routine use of chest X-rays does not influence the management of chest tubes. There is a lack of consensus on the highest fluid output threshold below which chest tubes can be safely removed. The optimal use of negative intra-pleural pressure has not yet been established despite multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. When attempting to improve efficiency in the management of chest tubes, evidence in support of drain removal without a trial of water seal should be considered. Inconsistencies in the interpretation of air leaks and in chest tube management are likely contributors to the conflicting results found in the literature. New digital pleural drainage systems, which provide a more objective air leak assessment and can record air leak trend over time, will likely contribute to the development of new evidence-based guidelines. Technology should be combined with continued efforts to standardize care, create clinical pathways, and analyze their impact on postoperative outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960489580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960489580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.67
DO - 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.67
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26941968
AN - SCOPUS:84960489580
SN - 2072-1439
VL - 8
SP - S3-S11
JO - Journal of Thoracic Disease
JF - Journal of Thoracic Disease
ER -