Persons With Diabetes and General/Family Practitioner Perspectives Related to Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Qualitative Focus Groups and the Theoretical Domains Framework: Results From the MOTION Study

Paulina K. Wrzal, Amir A. Mohseni, Carl Fournier, Ronald Goldenberg, Debbie Hollahan, Susie Jin, Sue D. Pedersen, Michael Vallis, Andrean Bunko, Varun Myageri, Atif Kukaswadia, Calum S. Neish, Noah M. Ivers

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

4 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Objectives: Therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is the failure to receive timely treatment intensification as indicated according to T2DM treatment guidelines. Multifactorial causes of therapeutic inertia in T2DM have been documented at the level of persons with diabetes (PwD), health-care providers and health-care systems. Methods: We developed a 3-part mixed-methods research program, called the Moving to Overcome Therapeutic Inertia Obstacles Now in T2DM (MOTION) study, to inform the development of strategies to address therapeutic inertia in T2DM. We present the results from focus groups with the following objectives: 1) understanding PwD and general practitioner/family practitioner (GPFP) determinants of behaviour related to treatment intensification using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); and 2) identifying the sources of behaviours contributing to therapeutic inertia in T2DM, as proposed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Two focus groups with PwD and 4 with GPFPs were conducted. Transcripts from the focus groups were coded independently by 2 investigators to identify themes, then mapped to TDF domains and linked using the BCW. Results: For PwD, the most commonly coded TDF domains were intentions, goals, knowledge, beliefs about consequences and social influences. For GPFPs, the most common domains were intentions, environmental context and resources and social/professional role and identity. The BCW identified that PwD interventions should include reflective motivation, psychological capability and social opportunity; GPFP interventions should include physical opportunity, social opportunity and reflective motivation. Conclusions: Comprehensive strategies that target both PwD and GPFP barriers would encourage a more collaborative approach toward treatment intensification decisions and reducing therapeutic inertia.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)171-180
Nombre de pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Diabetes
Volume46
Numéro de publication2
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - mars 2022

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
The authors thank all of the PwD and GPFP participants who took part in the focus groups for our study. This study was funded by Novo Nordisk Canada , Inc. N.M.I. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.

Funding Information:
The authors thank all of the PwD and GPFP participants who took part in the focus groups for our study. This study was funded by Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc. N.M.I. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Persons With Diabetes and General/Family Practitioner Perspectives Related to Therapeutic Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Qualitative Focus Groups and the Theoretical Domains Framework: Results From the MOTION Study'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer