Rationing care in COVID-19: If we must do it, can we do better?

Résultat de recherche: Review articleexamen par les pairs

12 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a proposal for frailty to be used as a rationing criterion. This commentary suggests circumstances under which that is defensible: In the face of lack of capacity to treat everyone, and as an alternative to age in stratifying risk. How best to stratify risk is likely to evolve and may include information about illness severity and dynamic measures. Current research must focus on mobilizing better, COVID-19-specific prognostic information, with a goal of best discriminating which lives are most and least likely to be saved should scarcity of resources dictate that not everyone can receive critical care.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)3-6
Nombre de pages4
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume50
Numéro de publication1
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - janv. 1 2021

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Editorial

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Rationing care in COVID-19: If we must do it, can we do better?'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer