Strategy of continued vs interrupted novel oral anticoagulant at time of device surgery in patients with moderate to high risk of arterial thromboembolic events: The BRUISE CONTROL-2 trial

Vidal Essebag, Jeff S. Healey, Felix Ayala-Paredes, Eli Kalfon, Benoit Coutu, Pablo Nery, Atul Verma, John Sapp, Francois Philippon, Roopinder K. Sandhu, Doug Coyle, John Eikelboom, George Wells, David H. Birnie

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

31 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Background Patients who require perioperative anticoagulation during cardiac implantable electronic device surgery are at increased risk for bleeding complications. The BRUISE CONTROL trial demonstrated that continuing warfarin was safer than heparin bridging, reducing the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma. Novel oral anticoagulants are being increasingly prescribed in place of warfarin. The best perioperative management of these new anticoagulants is unknown. Methods/Design A randomized controlled trial to investigate whether a strategy of continued vs interrupted novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) at the time of device surgery, in patients with moderate to high risk of arterial thromboembolic events, reduces the incidence of clinically significant hematoma (defined as a hematoma requiring reoperation and/or resulting in prolongation of hospitalization, and/or requiring interruption of anticoagulation). The secondary outcomes include components of the primary outcome, composite of all other major perioperative bleeding events, thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality, cost-effectiveness, patient quality of life, perioperative pain, and satisfaction. Planned analyses include descriptive statistics of all baseline variables. For the primary outcome, interrupted vs continued novel oral anticoagulant arms will be compared using the χ2 test. If any clinically significant differences are identified, a logistic regression analysis will be conducted. Quality of life will be assessed using EuroQol-5D, and perioperative pain using a visual analog scale. Discussion BRUISE CONTROL-2 is a randomized trial evaluating the best strategy to manage novel oral anticoagulants at the time of device surgery. We hypothesize that device surgery can be performed safely without interruption of these medications.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)102-107
Nombre de pages6
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume173
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - mars 1 2016
Publié à l'externeOui

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Strategy of continued vs interrupted novel oral anticoagulant at time of device surgery in patients with moderate to high risk of arterial thromboembolic events: The BRUISE CONTROL-2 trial'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer