Résumé
Technological advances in HLA laboratory testing undoubtedly improved the sensitivity and specificity of HLA antibody assessment but not without introducing a set of challenges regarding data interpretation. In particular, the introduction of solid-phase single-antigen bead (SAB) antibody assessment brought the belief that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was a quantifiable value. As such, MFI levels heavily influenced HLA antibody reporting, monitoring, and clinical practice. However, given that SAB testing was neither intended for nor approved to be quantifiable, is the use of MFI in current clinical and laboratory practice valid? What, if anything, does this numerical value actually reveal about the pathogenic potential of the antibody? What are the pitfalls and caveats associated with reporting MFI? Herein, we travel the road to HLA antibody assessment and explore the reliability of MFI values to make clinical decisions.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 1455-1461 |
Nombre de pages | 7 |
Journal | American Journal of Transplantation |
Volume | 17 |
Numéro de publication | 6 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - juin 2017 |
Note bibliographique
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Immunology and Allergy
- Transplantation
- Pharmacology (medical)