Résumé
Nestling birds produce a multicomponent begging display that has visual (e.g. posturing) and vocal (e.g. call rate) elements. Most work on the function of the display has focused on each component separately. However, understanding the evolution of complex displays such as begging requires knowledge of how the components function collectively. The purpose of our study was to determine how postural intensity and calling rate together influence parental feeding decisions in tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor. We compared how begging components responded to a manipulation in which pairs of nestlings were either free to approach the parent when it arrived to feed (unconfined treatment) or confined to the back of their nestbox by a Plexiglass partition (confined treatment). We found no significant differences in postural intensity between treatments, but calling rate was significantly higher in the confined treatment. In both treatments, postural intensity, but not calling rate, correlated with hunger. Both components positively and independently correlated with the likelihood of a nestling being fed, although the correlation with postural intensity was stronger. Previous work suggested that both posture and call rate advertised hunger in nestling tree swallows. Here, call rate was not associated with hunger, but rather was affected by nestling position. These results suggest that calling may serve an additional role in helping nestlings in disadvantaged positions attract parental attention. The results also suggest that calling may have a complex relationship with hunger, position and nestmates.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 188-193 |
Nombre de pages | 6 |
Journal | Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology |
Volume | 54 |
Numéro de publication | 2 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - juill. 1 2003 |
Note bibliographique
Funding Information:Acknowledgements We thank Andrea Beck and Anne Duncan for their help in the field and the members of the Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, especially Pete McGregor and Tom Peake, for helpful discussion. We also thank Bill Searcy, Ken Yasukawa and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript and the Coldwell, Minor and Hyne’s families for access to their land. This research was supported by a NSERC research grant to M.L.L. and a NSERC undergraduate scholarship to E.P. The experiment conducted in this study followed both federal and institutional requirements for the use of animals in research.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Animal Science and Zoology