Une vue laryngée délibérément restreinte à l’aide du vidéolaryngoscope GlideScope® est associée à une intubation trachéale plus rapide et plus aisée qu’une vue glottique totale: une étude clinique randomisée

Yuqi Gu, Joshua Robert, George Kovacs, Andrew D. Milne, Ian Morris, Orlando Hung, Kirk MacQuarrie, Sean Mackinnon, J. Adam Law

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

41 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Introduction: During video laryngoscopy (VL) with angulated or hyper-curved blades, it is sometimes difficult to complete tracheal intubation despite a full view of the larynx. When using indirect VL, it has been suggested that it may be preferable to obtain a deliberately restricted view of the larynx to facilitate passage of the endotracheal tube. We used the GlideScope® GVL video laryngoscope (GVL) to test whether deliberately obtaining a restricted view would result in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view of the larynx. Methods: We recruited 163 elective surgical patients and randomly allocated the participants to one of two groups: Group F, where a full view of the larynx was obtained and held during GVL-facilitated tracheal intubation, and Group R, with a restricted view of the larynx (< 50% of glottic opening visible). Study investigators experienced in indirect VL performed the intubations. The intubations were recorded and the video recordings were subsequently assessed for total time to intubation, ease of intubation using a visual analogue scale (VAS; where 0 = easy and 100 = difficult), first-attempt success rate, and oxygen saturation after intubation. Complications were also assessed. Results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to intubation was faster in Group R than in Group F (27 [22-36] sec vs 36 [27-48] sec, respectively; median difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 13; P < 0.001). The median [IQR] VAS rating for ease of intubation was also better in Group R than in Group F (14 [6-42) mm vs 50 mm [17-65], respectively; median difference, 20 mm; 95% CI, 10 to 31; P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding the first-attempt success rate, oxygen saturation immediately after intubation, or complications. Conclusions: Using the GVL with a deliberately restricted view of the larynx resulted in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view and with no additional complications. Our study suggests that obtaining a full or Cormack-Lehane grade 1 view may not be desirable when using the GVL. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02144207.

Titre traduit de la contributionA deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial
Langue d'origineFrench
Pages (de-à)928-937
Nombre de pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume63
Numéro de publication8
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - août 1 2016
Publié à l'externeOui

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
Work supported by the Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Une vue laryngée délibérément restreinte à l’aide du vidéolaryngoscope GlideScope® est associée à une intubation trachéale plus rapide et plus aisée qu’une vue glottique totale: une étude clinique randomisée'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer