Validity of laryngomalacia classification systems: A multi-institutional agreement study

Shanmugappiriya Sivarajah, Andre Isaac, Shelaina Anderson, Deepak Mehta, Paul Hong, Yaser Alrajhi, Hamdy El-Hakim

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

3 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Objectives: To determine the agreement of paediatric otolaryngologists on classifying laryngomalacia (LM). Design: Intra- and interobserver agreement study of two classification systems. Setting: Three tertiary referral paediatric centres. Participants: Three paediatric otolaryngologists, who were blinded to any clinical details, interpreted the videos of children diagnosed with LM using the Holinger and Olney classifications independently. They rated the videos twice with a washout period of at least 2 weeks. The main outcome measures: Inter- and intra-observer agreement measured by overall Fleiss kappa and unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients. The secondary outcome measures were inter- and intra-observer agreement on the individual anatomical subunits of the supraglottis affected by LM, characterised by the subcategories of the classifications. Results: Video records of infants and children <18 years who had an endoscopic diagnosis of LM from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively chosen for inclusion (n = 73). The overall Fleiss kappa coefficient was 0.25 (95% CI 0.18-0.32) amongst the raters using the Holinger classification and 0.31 (95% CI 0.21-0.42) for the Olney classification. Intra-observer agreement using the Holinger classification was 0.30 (95% CI 0.18-0.42), 0.62 (95% CI 0.23-0.85) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94], whilst the Olney classification yielded values of 0.41 (95% CI 0.26-0.56), 0.51 (95% CI 0.29-0.63) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.48-0.78). Conclusions: The agreement on types of LM between expert observers is modest using the Holinger and Olney classifications. This has significant implications for accurately diagnosing LM and exposes potential obstacles against credible pooling of data and extrapolation of information.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)471-476
Nombre de pages6
JournalClinical Otolaryngology
Volume45
Numéro de publication4
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - juill. 1 2020

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Validation Study

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Validity of laryngomalacia classification systems: A multi-institutional agreement study'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer