TY - JOUR
T1 - Ventilation with biphasic positive airway pressure in experimental lung injury
T2 - Influence of transpulmonary pressure on gas exchange and haemodynamics
AU - Henzler, Dietrich
AU - Dembinski, Rolf
AU - Bensberg, Ralf
AU - Hochhausen, Nadine
AU - Rossaint, Rolf
AU - Kuhlen, Ralf
PY - 2004/5
Y1 - 2004/5
N2 - Objective: We investigated whether improvement in ventilation perfusion (VA/Q̇) distribution during mechanical ventilation using biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) with spontaneous breathing may be attributed to an effectively increased transpulmonary pressure (PTP) and can also be achieved by increasing PTP during controlled ventilation. Design: In 12 pigs with saline lavage-induced lung injury we compared the effects of BIPAP to pressure-controlled ventilation with equal airway pressure (PCVAw) or equal transpulmonary pressure (PCVTP) on V̇A/Q̇ distribution assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). Setting: Animal laboratory study. Measurements and results: Intrapulmonary shunt was 33±11% during BIPAP, 36±10% during PCVAW and 33±15% during PCVTP (p= n.s.). BIPAP resulted in higher PaO2 than PCVAW (188±83 versus 147±82 mmHg, p<0.05), but not than PCVTP (187±139 mmHg). Oxygen delivery was significantly higher during BIPAP (530±109 ml/min) versus 374±113 ml/min during PCVAw and 353±93 ml/min during PCVTP (p<0.005). Tidal volume with PCVTP increased to 11.9±2.3 ml/kg, compared to 8.5±0.8 with BIPAP and 7.6±1.4 with PCVAw (p<0.001) and cardiac output decreased to 3.5±0.61/min (BIPAP 4.9±0.8 and PCV Aw 3.9±0.8, p<0.006). Conclusions: In experimental lung injury, BIPAP with preserved spontaneous breathing was effective in increasing regional PTP, since pressure-controlled ventilation with the same PTP resulted in similar gas exchange effects. However, PCVTP caused increased airway pressures and tidal volumes, whereby, with BIPAP, less depression of oxygen delivery and cardiac output were observed. BIPAP could be useful in maintaining pulmonary gas exchange and slightly improving oxygenation without interfering with circulation as strongly as PCV does.
AB - Objective: We investigated whether improvement in ventilation perfusion (VA/Q̇) distribution during mechanical ventilation using biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) with spontaneous breathing may be attributed to an effectively increased transpulmonary pressure (PTP) and can also be achieved by increasing PTP during controlled ventilation. Design: In 12 pigs with saline lavage-induced lung injury we compared the effects of BIPAP to pressure-controlled ventilation with equal airway pressure (PCVAw) or equal transpulmonary pressure (PCVTP) on V̇A/Q̇ distribution assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). Setting: Animal laboratory study. Measurements and results: Intrapulmonary shunt was 33±11% during BIPAP, 36±10% during PCVAW and 33±15% during PCVTP (p= n.s.). BIPAP resulted in higher PaO2 than PCVAW (188±83 versus 147±82 mmHg, p<0.05), but not than PCVTP (187±139 mmHg). Oxygen delivery was significantly higher during BIPAP (530±109 ml/min) versus 374±113 ml/min during PCVAw and 353±93 ml/min during PCVTP (p<0.005). Tidal volume with PCVTP increased to 11.9±2.3 ml/kg, compared to 8.5±0.8 with BIPAP and 7.6±1.4 with PCVAw (p<0.001) and cardiac output decreased to 3.5±0.61/min (BIPAP 4.9±0.8 and PCV Aw 3.9±0.8, p<0.006). Conclusions: In experimental lung injury, BIPAP with preserved spontaneous breathing was effective in increasing regional PTP, since pressure-controlled ventilation with the same PTP resulted in similar gas exchange effects. However, PCVTP caused increased airway pressures and tidal volumes, whereby, with BIPAP, less depression of oxygen delivery and cardiac output were observed. BIPAP could be useful in maintaining pulmonary gas exchange and slightly improving oxygenation without interfering with circulation as strongly as PCV does.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442577121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442577121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-003-2146-8
DO - 10.1007/s00134-003-2146-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 14985965
AN - SCOPUS:2442577121
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 30
SP - 935
EP - 943
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 5
ER -