What has trust got to do with it? Cardiac risk reduction and family physicians' discussions of evidence-based recommendations

Lois A. Jackson; Wayne Putnam; Peter L. Twohig; Frederick I. Burge; Kelly Nicol; Jafna L. Cox

doi:10.1080/1369857042000275650

What has trust got to do with it? Cardiac risk reduction and family physicians' discussions of evidence-based recommendations

Lois A. Jackson, Wayne Putnam, Peter L. Twohig, Frederick I. Burge, Kelly Nicol, Jafna L. Cox

Medicine

Résultat de recherche: Article › examen par les pairs

5 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The management of patients through the use of evidence-based medicine has become the 'mantra' of medicine within many Western countries. Evidence-based medicine is aimed at providing the best objective, scientific care to all patients, and reducing as far as possible patients' risks of disease and complications from disease. Based on family physicians' discussions of the use of evidence-based recommendations for two cardiac diseases, this paper explores how subjectively-based trust enters into family physicians' decision to use evidence-based medicine. In addition, we show how trust influences physicians' work of recommending evidence-based medicine to patients, and physicians' perceptions of why patients follow recommendations aimed at risk reduction. We conclude that although much of the current discussion about evidence-based medicine assumes a 'rational' model of physician behaviour based on the application of the 'best objective scientific' results, subjectively-based perceptions of trust influence physician practices, and point to the need to understand the power of relational issues in influencing physician practices even when utilizing evidence-based knowledge.

Langue d'origine	English
Pages (de-à)	239-255
Nombre de pages	17
Journal	Health, Risk and Society
Volume	6
Numéro de publication	3
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/1369857042000275650
Statut de publication	Published - sept. 2004

Note bibliographique

Funding Information:
We wish to thank the family physicians who gave of their time and expertise to participate in the focus groups. We also wish to thank and acknowledge Natalie Dawson for her careful transcription of the audiotapes. Study 1 was funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada (now the Canadian Institutes of Health Research), and Study 2 the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF). L. Jackson and J. Cox are both recipients of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)/Regional Partnership Program, Investigator Award. J. Cox and F. Burge both hold a Clinical Research Scholarship from the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, and P. Twohig is a Canada Research Chair, Saint Mary’s University, Nova Scotia (Canada). We collectively thank the funding agencies for their support.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

ODD de l’ONU

Cette action contribue à la réalisation des objectifs de développement durable suivants

Accès au document

10.1080/1369857042000275650

Autres fichiers et liens

Citer

@article{0cb8ecfcf750403bbaa6187d52a0390b,

title = "What has trust got to do with it? Cardiac risk reduction and family physicians' discussions of evidence-based recommendations",

abstract = "The management of patients through the use of evidence-based medicine has become the 'mantra' of medicine within many Western countries. Evidence-based medicine is aimed at providing the best objective, scientific care to all patients, and reducing as far as possible patients' risks of disease and complications from disease. Based on family physicians' discussions of the use of evidence-based recommendations for two cardiac diseases, this paper explores how subjectively-based trust enters into family physicians' decision to use evidence-based medicine. In addition, we show how trust influences physicians' work of recommending evidence-based medicine to patients, and physicians' perceptions of why patients follow recommendations aimed at risk reduction. We conclude that although much of the current discussion about evidence-based medicine assumes a 'rational' model of physician behaviour based on the application of the 'best objective scientific' results, subjectively-based perceptions of trust influence physician practices, and point to the need to understand the power of relational issues in influencing physician practices even when utilizing evidence-based knowledge.",

author = "Jackson, {Lois A.} and Wayne Putnam and Twohig, {Peter L.} and Burge, {Frederick I.} and Kelly Nicol and Cox, {Jafna L.}",

note = "Funding Information: We wish to thank the family physicians who gave of their time and expertise to participate in the focus groups. We also wish to thank and acknowledge Natalie Dawson for her careful transcription of the audiotapes. Study 1 was funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada (now the Canadian Institutes of Health Research), and Study 2 the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF). L. Jackson and J. Cox are both recipients of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)/Regional Partnership Program, Investigator Award. J. Cox and F. Burge both hold a Clinical Research Scholarship from the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, and P. Twohig is a Canada Research Chair, Saint Mary{\textquoteright}s University, Nova Scotia (Canada). We collectively thank the funding agencies for their support.",

year = "2004",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1080/1369857042000275650",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "239--255",

journal = "Health, Risk and Society",

issn = "1369-8575",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What has trust got to do with it? Cardiac risk reduction and family physicians' discussions of evidence-based recommendations

AU - Jackson, Lois A.

AU - Putnam, Wayne

AU - Twohig, Peter L.

AU - Burge, Frederick I.

AU - Nicol, Kelly

AU - Cox, Jafna L.

N1 - Funding Information: We wish to thank the family physicians who gave of their time and expertise to participate in the focus groups. We also wish to thank and acknowledge Natalie Dawson for her careful transcription of the audiotapes. Study 1 was funded by the Medical Research Council of Canada (now the Canadian Institutes of Health Research), and Study 2 the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF). L. Jackson and J. Cox are both recipients of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)/Regional Partnership Program, Investigator Award. J. Cox and F. Burge both hold a Clinical Research Scholarship from the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, and P. Twohig is a Canada Research Chair, Saint Mary’s University, Nova Scotia (Canada). We collectively thank the funding agencies for their support.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - The management of patients through the use of evidence-based medicine has become the 'mantra' of medicine within many Western countries. Evidence-based medicine is aimed at providing the best objective, scientific care to all patients, and reducing as far as possible patients' risks of disease and complications from disease. Based on family physicians' discussions of the use of evidence-based recommendations for two cardiac diseases, this paper explores how subjectively-based trust enters into family physicians' decision to use evidence-based medicine. In addition, we show how trust influences physicians' work of recommending evidence-based medicine to patients, and physicians' perceptions of why patients follow recommendations aimed at risk reduction. We conclude that although much of the current discussion about evidence-based medicine assumes a 'rational' model of physician behaviour based on the application of the 'best objective scientific' results, subjectively-based perceptions of trust influence physician practices, and point to the need to understand the power of relational issues in influencing physician practices even when utilizing evidence-based knowledge.

AB - The management of patients through the use of evidence-based medicine has become the 'mantra' of medicine within many Western countries. Evidence-based medicine is aimed at providing the best objective, scientific care to all patients, and reducing as far as possible patients' risks of disease and complications from disease. Based on family physicians' discussions of the use of evidence-based recommendations for two cardiac diseases, this paper explores how subjectively-based trust enters into family physicians' decision to use evidence-based medicine. In addition, we show how trust influences physicians' work of recommending evidence-based medicine to patients, and physicians' perceptions of why patients follow recommendations aimed at risk reduction. We conclude that although much of the current discussion about evidence-based medicine assumes a 'rational' model of physician behaviour based on the application of the 'best objective scientific' results, subjectively-based perceptions of trust influence physician practices, and point to the need to understand the power of relational issues in influencing physician practices even when utilizing evidence-based knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244250176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244250176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1369857042000275650

DO - 10.1080/1369857042000275650

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:7244250176

SN - 1369-8575

VL - 6

SP - 239

EP - 255

JO - Health, Risk and Society

JF - Health, Risk and Society

IS - 3

ER -

What has trust got to do with it? Cardiac risk reduction and family physicians' discussions of evidence-based recommendations

Résumé

Note bibliographique

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

ODD de l’ONU

Accès au document

Autres fichiers et liens

Empreinte numérique

Citer