A systematic approach for evaluating port effectiveness

Mary R. Brooks, Tony Schellinck, Athanasios A. Pallis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine how users evaluate port effectiveness and identify those constructs relevant to that evaluation. The three user groups studied are carriers, cargo interests, and suppliers of services at the port. The study team developed an on-line survey instrument and delivered it to Canadian port users with the assistance of eight industry organizations. The findings of the research are based on the contributions of 57 decision makers with port usage experience, many of whom fit into more than one group of users. The study concludes that the evaluation criteria influencing users' perceptions of satisfaction, competitiveness, and service delivery effectiveness are different, and so while the determinants of these constructs have considerable overlap, they are different constructs. This paper also illustrates how independent (or third-party) evaluation of port performance might be used by a port to strategically improve its service to users, and therefore have value from a port perspective in its strategic planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-334
Number of pages20
JournalMaritime Policy and Management
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic approach for evaluating port effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this