Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cholesteatoma Using PROPELLER at 1.5T: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Sharon E. Clarke, Dipan Mistry, Talal AlThubaiti, M. Naeem Khan, David Morris, Manohar Bance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the diffusion-weighted periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) technique in the detection of cholesteatoma at our institution with surgical confirmation in all cases. Methods A retrospective review of 21 consecutive patients who underwent diffusion-weighted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a 1.5T MRI scanner prior to primary or revision/second-look surgery for suspected cholesteatoma from 2009-2012 was performed. Results Diffusion-weighted PROPELLER had a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 43%. In the 15 patients for whom the presence or absence of cholesteatoma was correctly predicted, there were 2 cases where the reported locations of diffusion restriction did not correspond to the location of the cholesteatoma observed at surgery. Conclusion On the basis of our retrospective study, we conclude that diffusion-weighted PROPELLER MRI is not sufficiently accurate to replace second look surgery at our institution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-121
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Canadian Association of Radiologists

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cholesteatoma Using PROPELLER at 1.5T: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this