Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia

Benjamin Capps, Michele Marie Bailey, David Bickford, Richard Coker, Zohar Lederman, Andrew Lover, Tamra Lysaght, Paul Tambyah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-596
Number of pages9
JournalBioethics
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this