Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia

Benjamin Capps, Michele Marie Bailey, David Bickford, Richard Coker, Zohar Lederman, Andrew Lover, Tamra Lysaght, Paul Tambyah

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

28 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)588-596
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónBioethics
Volumen29
N.º8
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct. 1 2015

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto