Editorial Commentary: Using Bankart “Plus” Techniques to Tackle Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss: Can Newer Arthroscopic Adjuncts Provide Long-Term Stability?

Erin E. Gordey, Ivan Ho bun Wong

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaEditorialrevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The debate between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the Latarjet technique for patients with anterior shoulder instability largely hinges on the argument between redislocation rate versus complication rate. This difference becomes more apparent when considering patients with bone loss. We believe that Bankart “plus” techniques, including arthroscopic anatomic bone grafting, create a stable shoulder with a low instability recurrence rate, while maintaining a complication rate comparable to the Bankart repair.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)2294-2297
Número de páginas4
PublicaciónArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volumen34
N.º8
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago. 2018

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Editorial
  • Comment

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Editorial Commentary: Using Bankart “Plus” Techniques to Tackle Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss: Can Newer Arthroscopic Adjuncts Provide Long-Term Stability?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto