Editorial Commentary: Using Bankart “Plus” Techniques to Tackle Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss: Can Newer Arthroscopic Adjuncts Provide Long-Term Stability?

Erin E. Gordey, Ivan Ho bun Wong

Résultat de recherche: Editorialexamen par les pairs

2 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The debate between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the Latarjet technique for patients with anterior shoulder instability largely hinges on the argument between redislocation rate versus complication rate. This difference becomes more apparent when considering patients with bone loss. We believe that Bankart “plus” techniques, including arthroscopic anatomic bone grafting, create a stable shoulder with a low instability recurrence rate, while maintaining a complication rate comparable to the Bankart repair.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)2294-2297
Nombre de pages4
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume34
Numéro de publication8
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - août 2018

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Editorial
  • Comment

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Editorial Commentary: Using Bankart “Plus” Techniques to Tackle Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss: Can Newer Arthroscopic Adjuncts Provide Long-Term Stability?'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer