Résumé
The debate between arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the Latarjet technique for patients with anterior shoulder instability largely hinges on the argument between redislocation rate versus complication rate. This difference becomes more apparent when considering patients with bone loss. We believe that Bankart “plus” techniques, including arthroscopic anatomic bone grafting, create a stable shoulder with a low instability recurrence rate, while maintaining a complication rate comparable to the Bankart repair.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 2294-2297 |
Nombre de pages | 4 |
Journal | Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery |
Volume | 34 |
Numéro de publication | 8 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - août 2018 |
Note bibliographique
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Editorial
- Comment