Intra and inter technologist variability in the quality assessment of respiratory tract specimens

Geraldine M. Cooper, Janice J. Jones, Judy C. Arbique, Gordon J. Flowerdew, Kevin R. Forward

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

19 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The majority of microbiology laboratories have implemented quality improvement procedures such as a Q scoring system to assess the nature of clinical specimens. Our study reviewed the sources and the amount of variation when Q scoring of lower respiratory secretions was performed. In total, 450 slides representing lower respiratory tract secretions were Q scored by three experienced technologists. Total agreement regarding the number of neutrophils, squamous epithelial cells and Q scores was 76%, 57% and 57% respectively. The major factor influencing Q score values was the enumeration of epithelial cells. From our findings, we expect that there is greater variability in Q scoring then is generally acknowledged and there is a substantial degree of subjectivity on part of individual technologists reading gram stains. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)231-235
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volumen37
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago. 2000

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Intra and inter technologist variability in the quality assessment of respiratory tract specimens'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto