Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Peter T. Morley, Eddy Lang, Richard Aickin, John E. Billi, Brian Eigel, Jose Maria E. Ferrer, Judith C. Finn, Lana M. Gent, Russell E. Griffin, Mary Fran Hazinski, Ian K. Maconochie, William H. Montgomery, Laurie J. Morrison, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Nikolaos I. Nikolaou, Jerry P. Nolan, Gavin D. Perkins, Michael R. Sayre, Andrew H. Travers, Jonathan WyllieDavid A. Zideman

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

23 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The process for evaluating the resuscitation science has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades. The current process, which incorporates the use of the GRADE methodology, culminated in the 2015 CoSTR publication, which in turn will inform the international resuscitation councils' guideline development processes. Over the next few years, the process will continue to evolve as ILCOR moves toward a more continuous evaluation of the resuscitation science.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)S40-S50
PublicaciónCirculation
Volumen132
DOI
EstadoPublished - oct. 20 2015

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc., European Resuscitation Council, and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference
  • Journal Article

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto