Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Peter T. Morley, Eddy Lang, Richard Aickin, John E. Billi, Brian Eigel, Jose Maria E. Ferrer, Judith C. Finn, Lana M. Gent, Russell E. Griffin, Mary Fran Hazinski, Ian K. Maconochie, William H. Montgomery, Laurie J. Morrison, Vinay M. Nadkarni, Nikolaos I. Nikolaou, Jerry P. Nolan, Gavin D. Perkins, Michael R. Sayre, Andrew H. Travers, Jonathan WyllieDavid A. Zideman

Résultat de recherche: Articleexamen par les pairs

23 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The process for evaluating the resuscitation science has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades. The current process, which incorporates the use of the GRADE methodology, culminated in the 2015 CoSTR publication, which in turn will inform the international resuscitation councils' guideline development processes. Over the next few years, the process will continue to evolve as ILCOR moves toward a more continuous evaluation of the resuscitation science.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)S40-S50
JournalCirculation
Volume132
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - oct. 20 2015

Note bibliographique

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc., European Resuscitation Council, and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference
  • Journal Article

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer